GMR not relevant in ABE [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-03-30 13:19 (2514 d 22:07 ago) – Posting: # 18624
Views: 6,245

Hi Biostats

❝ Is it mandatory to check - point estimate of the Test/Reference geometric mean ratio must fall within 80.00 - 125.00%?


See your condition #2 and the guidance

Every study should pass the scaled average bioequivalence limits and also regular unscaled bioequivalence limits of 80.00–125.00%.


What do you think where the GMR lies if a study passes ABE? It is only nice to know (unless you are concerned about this discussion). If a study fails ABE, the location of the GMR is even less relevant. Hence, the FDA does not ask for it.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,381 posts in 4,914 threads, 1,662 registered users;
31 visitors (0 registered, 31 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:26 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones.
But a collection of facts is no more a science
than a heap of stones is a house.    Henri Poincaré

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5