[Opinion] Should the 90% CI for GMR be required to encompass 1 [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2018-03-29 23:22 (2217 d 20:29 ago) – Posting: # 18621
Views: 9,741

If I recall (or I am imagining things), FDA published a paper about NTI drug BE assessment (Helmut, help! Am I hallucinating again?)

Anyhow, Have you looked at this FDA slide presentation before?

NTI

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,656 registered users;
62 visitors (0 registered, 62 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

So far as I can remember,
there is not one word in the Gospels
in praise of intelligence.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5