[Opinion] Should the 90% CI for GMR be required to encompass 1 [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by bebac_fan – US, 2018-03-29 22:30 (2359 d 07:28 ago) – Posting: # 18620
Views: 10,484

❝ Before we go further, does your hypothetical example pass the other two criteria stated in the NTI guidance?


Yes, it would. See Helmut's post further up in the thread.

The point is, at Swr of .22, if you pass criteria 1, you generally pass criteria 2. Criteria 3 passes.

Thanks,
BF

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,223 posts in 4,877 threads, 1,655 registered users;
27 visitors (0 registered, 27 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown
is the belief that one’s work is terribly important.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5