[Opinion] Should the 90% CI for GMR be required to encompass 1 [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by bebac_fan – US, 2018-03-29 20:30 (1348 d 22:59 ago) – Posting: # 18620
Views: 8,416

» Before we go further, does your hypothetical example pass the other two criteria stated in the NTI guidance?

Yes, it would. See Helmut's post further up in the thread.

The point is, at Swr of .22, if you pass criteria 1, you generally pass criteria 2. Criteria 3 passes.

Thanks,
BF

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,788 posts in 4,557 threads, 1,548 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 18:30 CET (Europe/Vienna)

A big computer, a complex algorithm and a long time
does not equal science.    Robert Gentleman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5