[Opinion] Should the 90% CI for GMR be required to encompass 1 [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by bebac_fan – US, 2018-03-29 22:30 (2549 d 21:31 ago) – Posting: # 18620
Views: 11,226

❝ Before we go further, does your hypothetical example pass the other two criteria stated in the NTI guidance?


Yes, it would. See Helmut's post further up in the thread.

The point is, at Swr of .22, if you pass criteria 1, you generally pass criteria 2. Criteria 3 passes.

Thanks,
BF

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,669 registered users;
21 visitors (0 registered, 21 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:02 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove
anything that’s even remotely true!    Homer Simpson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5