[Opinion] Should the 90% CI for GMR be required to encompass 1 [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by bebac_fan – US, 2018-03-29 20:30 (1601 d 22:51 ago) – Posting: # 18620
Views: 8,800

» Before we go further, does your hypothetical example pass the other two criteria stated in the NTI guidance?

Yes, it would. See Helmut's post further up in the thread.

The point is, at Swr of .22, if you pass criteria 1, you generally pass criteria 2. Criteria 3 passes.

Thanks,
BF

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,305 posts in 4,668 threads, 1,587 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 19:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There is no point in being precise when you don’t know
what you’re talking about.    attributed to John Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5