[Opinion] Should the 90% CI for GMR be required to encompass 1 [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by bebac_fan – US, 2018-03-29 22:30 (2515 d 22:45 ago) – Posting: # 18620
Views: 11,116

❝ Before we go further, does your hypothetical example pass the other two criteria stated in the NTI guidance?


Yes, it would. See Helmut's post further up in the thread.

The point is, at Swr of .22, if you pass criteria 1, you generally pass criteria 2. Criteria 3 passes.

Thanks,
BF

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,381 posts in 4,914 threads, 1,663 registered users;
48 visitors (0 registered, 48 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:16 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones.
But a collection of facts is no more a science
than a heap of stones is a house.    Henri Poincaré

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5