[Opinion] Should the 90% CI for GMR be required to encompass 1 [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2018-03-29 18:52 (2211 d 23:56 ago) – Posting: # 18616
Views: 9,733

So basically he's questioning the validity of FDA's 20% window on BE then...
John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,986 posts in 4,823 threads, 1,668 registered users;
59 visitors (0 registered, 59 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:48 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Art is “I”; science is “we”.    Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5