[Opinion] Should the 90% CI for GMR be required to encompass 1 [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2018-03-29 18:52 (2300 d 09:32 ago) – Posting: # 18616
Views: 10,236

So basically he's questioning the validity of FDA's 20% window on BE then...
John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,101 posts in 4,857 threads, 1,644 registered users;
80 visitors (0 registered, 80 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

One can show the following: given any rule, however “fundamental”
or “necessary” for science, there are always circumstances
when it is advisable not only to ignore the rule,
but to adopt its opposite.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5