other than 90% CI in BE study? [R for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-03-15 15:18  – Posting: # 18554
Views: 6,281

Hi roro2907,

» I am just curious as I am reviewing a BE study which has used a 94.12 confidence interval. Do you have any ideas as to why this is?

As Yung-jin assumed it smells of a Two-Stage Design of the Potvin flavour. ;-) It would need a major rewrite of bear because we not only need an option to specify an adjusted α (which is always <0.05) but – if the study proceeded to the second stage – “stage” in the model. BTW, you might face different CIs in the future (see this presentation).

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,103 posts in 4,243 threads, 1,382 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 01:43 UTC

We must be careful not to confuse data with the abstractions
we use to analyze them.    William James

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5