other than 90% CI in BE study? [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-03-15 17:18 (2290 d 07:31 ago) – Posting: # 18554
Views: 9,454

Hi roro2907,

❝ I am just curious as I am reviewing a BE study which has used a 94.12 confidence interval. Do you have any ideas as to why this is?


As Yung-jin assumed it smells of a Two-Stage Design of the Potvin flavour. ;-) It would need a major rewrite of bear because we not only need an option to specify an adjusted α (which is always <0.05) but – if the study proceeded to the second stage – “stage” in the model. BTW, you might face different CIs in the future (see this presentation).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,059 posts in 4,841 threads, 1,662 registered users;
32 visitors (0 registered, 32 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[…] an inappropriate study design is incapable of answering
a research question, no matter how careful the subsequent
methodology, conduct, analysis, and interpretation:
Flawless execution of a flawed design achieves nothing worthwhile.    J. Rick Turner

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5