other than 90% CI in BE study? [R for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-03-15 16:18  – Posting: # 18554
Views: 7,017

Hi roro2907,

» I am just curious as I am reviewing a BE study which has used a 94.12 confidence interval. Do you have any ideas as to why this is?

As Yung-jin assumed it smells of a Two-Stage Design of the Potvin flavour. ;-) It would need a major rewrite of bear because we not only need an option to specify an adjusted α (which is always <0.05) but – if the study proceeded to the second stage – “stage” in the model. BTW, you might face different CIs in the future (see this presentation).

Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
20,618 posts in 4,321 threads, 1,435 registered users;
online 19 (0 registered, 19 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:01 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz