Low AUC after reference product [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2018-03-15 11:56 (2597 d 05:59 ago) – Posting: # 18550
Views: 5,779

Hi Helmut,

❝ Correct – if you didn’t state such a possible reason for exclusion it in the protocol.


If 5% GMR for ref is not mentioned in the Protocol isn't possible just to refer to EMA or other appropriate GL (depending on the jurisdiction)?

Have you ever seen lucky guys in EMA jurisdiction who stated in the protocol some additional reasons for exclusion (not mentioned in GL) after ending the bioanalytical part and successfully applied them in borderline case like that?

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
29 visitors (0 registered, 29 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5