Low AUC after reference product [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2018-03-15 11:56 (2670 d 16:10 ago) – Posting: # 18550
Views: 5,948

Hi Helmut,

❝ Correct – if you didn’t state such a possible reason for exclusion it in the protocol.


If 5% GMR for ref is not mentioned in the Protocol isn't possible just to refer to EMA or other appropriate GL (depending on the jurisdiction)?

Have you ever seen lucky guys in EMA jurisdiction who stated in the protocol some additional reasons for exclusion (not mentioned in GL) after ending the bioanalytical part and successfully applied them in borderline case like that?

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,680 registered users;
35 visitors (0 registered, 35 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5