Low AUC after reference product [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2018-03-15 10:56 (854 d 03:27 ago) – Posting: # 18550
Views: 3,608

Hi Helmut,

» Correct – if you didn’t state such a possible reason for exclusion it in the protocol.

If 5% GMR for ref is not mentioned in the Protocol isn't possible just to refer to EMA or other appropriate GL (depending on the jurisdiction)?

Have you ever seen lucky guys in EMA jurisdiction who stated in the protocol some additional reasons for exclusion (not mentioned in GL) after ending the bioanalytical part and successfully applied them in borderline case like that?

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,859 posts in 4,361 threads, 1,451 registered users;
online 31 (1 registered, 30 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The interpretation of facts in a certain way
stimulates other scientists’ thoughts.    Róbert Bárány

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5