Low AUC after reference product [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2018-03-15 10:56 (1318 d 16:56 ago) – Posting: # 18550
Views: 4,316

Hi Helmut,

» Correct – if you didn’t state such a possible reason for exclusion it in the protocol.

If 5% GMR for ref is not mentioned in the Protocol isn't possible just to refer to EMA or other appropriate GL (depending on the jurisdiction)?

Have you ever seen lucky guys in EMA jurisdiction who stated in the protocol some additional reasons for exclusion (not mentioned in GL) after ending the bioanalytical part and successfully applied them in borderline case like that?

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,753 posts in 4,548 threads, 1,544 registered users;
online 21 (0 registered, 21 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 04:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

They were “so intent of making everything numerical”
that they frequently missed seeing
what was there to be seen.    Barbara McClintock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5