Low AUC after reference product [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2018-03-15 11:56 (1842 d 17:27 ago) – Posting: # 18550
Views: 4,659

Hi Helmut,

❝ Correct – if you didn’t state such a possible reason for exclusion it in the protocol.

If 5% GMR for ref is not mentioned in the Protocol isn't possible just to refer to EMA or other appropriate GL (depending on the jurisdiction)?

Have you ever seen lucky guys in EMA jurisdiction who stated in the protocol some additional reasons for exclusion (not mentioned in GL) after ending the bioanalytical part and successfully applied them in borderline case like that?

Kind regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,559 posts in 4,725 threads, 1,607 registered users;
13 visitors (0 registered, 13 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The penalty for scientific irrelevance is, of course,
that the statistician’s work is ignored by the scientific community.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz