known.designs() [General Statistics]
Hi Louis,
One sequence? Are you thinking about a paired design? IMHO, DDI studies should be performed as crossovers. In paired designs you have to assume (!) that there are no period effects. However, if you have data of such a study, use e.g.,
BTW, the function
❝ […] something like CVfromCI but based on a DDI rather than BE? Let's say a DDI with one sequence for which we know the PE and CLs for the GMR (test vs. reference).
One sequence? Are you thinking about a paired design? IMHO, DDI studies should be performed as crossovers. In paired designs you have to assume (!) that there are no period effects. However, if you have data of such a study, use e.g.,
library(PowerTOST)
CVfromCI(lower=0.89, upper=1.15, n=24, design="paired")
# [1] 0.2634199
BTW, the function
CVfromCI()
(alias CI2CV()
) supports all designs listed in known.designs()
.—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- intra-subject variability from CI verstc 2018-02-26 10:15 [General Statistics]
- intra-subject variability from CI d_labes 2018-02-26 12:26
- intra-subject variability from CI verstc 2018-02-26 13:41
- intra-subject variability from CI Helmut 2018-02-26 13:51
- intra-subject variability from CI Louis52 2018-03-09 14:27
- known.designs()Helmut 2018-03-09 14:39
- known.designs() Louis52 2018-03-09 15:13
- known.designs() Helmut 2018-03-09 15:42
- known.designs() Louis52 2018-03-09 15:13
- known.designs()Helmut 2018-03-09 14:39
- intra-subject variability from CI Louis52 2018-03-09 14:27
- intra-subject variability from CI d_labes 2018-02-26 12:26