TIE depends on CVwR (and n) [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-02-28 14:48 (1376 d 09:42 ago) – Posting: # 18485
Views: 8,574

Dear Pjs,

» […] study is passing the SCABE criteria.

If you are referring to the FDA’s RSABE approach, there is not problem with inflation of the Type I Error if (the true) CVwR ≥30%. Only with CVwR <30% problems might be massive (see this presentation).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,785 posts in 4,556 threads, 1,548 registered users;
online 11 (1 registered, 10 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 00:30 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The history of statistics is like a telephone directory:
the plot is boring, full of numbers and the cast is endless.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz