TIE depends on CVwR (and n) [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-02-28 14:48 (1541 d 04:49 ago) – Posting: # 18485
Views: 8,791

Dear Pjs,

» […] study is passing the SCABE criteria.

If you are referring to the FDA’s RSABE approach, there is not problem with inflation of the Type I Error if (the true) CVwR ≥30%. Only with CVwR <30% problems might be massive (see this presentation).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,085 posts in 4,629 threads, 1,566 registered users;
online 14 (0 registered, 14 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 20:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

That which is not controversial
is of no particular interest.    Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz