Sex in crossover [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-02-28 13:42 (2188 d 01:38 ago) – Posting: # 18482
Views: 13,171

Hi nobody,

❝ […] it's not the purpose of BE-studies to investigate sex as a covariate in PK.


Agree. For ages we routinely included ♀/♂ in our studies. Bioanalysts were in :love: with females cause their concentrations were higher…

❝ But in the times of SJWs and alike you have to justify (!) if you don't want to have this aspect investigated in your BE-study.


BfArM = early SJW? In March 2005 we received a deficiency letter. Relevant section in all of its doubtful beauty:

Gemäß §7 Abs. 2; Ziffer 12 GCP-V fehlt im Prüfplan eine Begründung dafür, dass die ge­wählte Geschlechter­verteilung in der Gruppe der betroffenen Personen zur Feststellung möglicher geschlechts­spezifischer Unterschiede bei der Wirksamkeit oder Unbedenklichkeit des geprüften Arzneimittels angemessen ist.

Heck, it was a “sprinkle study” and the drug has no sex-related differences in PK. Since that time, ♂ only.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,911 posts in 4,806 threads, 1,635 registered users;
41 visitors (1 registered, 40 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:21 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The history of statistics is like a telephone directory:
the plot is boring, full of numbers and the cast is endless.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5