Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea? [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2018-02-27 23:47 (2572 d 11:42 ago) – Posting: # 18474
Views: 3,712

Hi Iceland II

Sounds good. With highly variable Cmax point estimates are frequently jumping around like hell between studies, but with highly variable AUC the point estimate from pilot should be more reliable/less freakish (with a reasonably high n), right? Didn't have a look at the numbers recently...

Thanks for reply!

(-11.4°C right in front the window... still falling...)

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,408 posts in 4,920 threads, 1,665 registered users;
34 visitors (1 registered, 33 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:30 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Tortured data will confess to anything.    Fredric Menger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5