Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea? [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2018-02-27 23:47 (2306 d 00:10 ago) – Posting: # 18474
Views: 3,255

Hi Iceland II

Sounds good. With highly variable Cmax point estimates are frequently jumping around like hell between studies, but with highly variable AUC the point estimate from pilot should be more reliable/less freakish (with a reasonably high n), right? Didn't have a look at the numbers recently...

Thanks for reply!

(-11.4°C right in front the window... still falling...)

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,059 posts in 4,841 threads, 1,663 registered users;
31 visitors (0 registered, 31 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[…] an inappropriate study design is incapable of answering
a research question, no matter how careful the subsequent
methodology, conduct, analysis, and interpretation:
Flawless execution of a flawed design achieves nothing worthwhile.    J. Rick Turner

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5