Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea? [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2018-02-27 23:47 (2248 d 05:26 ago) – Posting: # 18474
Views: 3,067

Hi Iceland II

Sounds good. With highly variable Cmax point estimates are frequently jumping around like hell between studies, but with highly variable AUC the point estimate from pilot should be more reliable/less freakish (with a reasonably high n), right? Didn't have a look at the numbers recently...

Thanks for reply!

(-11.4°C right in front the window... still falling...)
—
Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,656 registered users;
102 visitors (0 registered, 102 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5