Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea? [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2018-02-27 23:47 (1858 d 04:57 ago) – Posting: # 18474
Views: 2,862

Hi Iceland II

Sounds good. With highly variable Cmax point estimates are frequently jumping around like hell between studies, but with highly variable AUC the point estimate from pilot should be more reliable/less freakish (with a reasonably high n), right? Didn't have a look at the numbers recently...

Thanks for reply!

(-11.4°C right in front the window... still falling...)
—
Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,559 posts in 4,725 threads, 1,607 registered users;
13 visitors (0 registered, 13 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The penalty for scientific irrelevance is, of course,
that the statistician’s work is ignored by the scientific community.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5