Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea? [Design Issues]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2018-02-27 22:42 (2519 d 11:36 ago) – Posting: # 18473
Views: 3,577

Hy yourself,

❝ Sponsor wants to make a little cheaper by having only 24 h sampling in the pilot, but considerably longer in the pivotal trial.


❝ Good idea? Regarding sample size estimation for the pivotal (including adjusted acceptance range for Cmax, but standard acceptance range for AUC...).


That's likely going to be fine. It will regularly be Cmax that is the showstopper. Even if your AUC does not cover 80% and if you are not sampling to 72hrs, then the idea you get about AUC aspects will still be very qualified.

Note one thing which is commonly misunderstood: When pilot trials have small sample sizes compared to pivotal studies (which is almost a definition) then they do not give good info about formulation matches in BE (or, where applicable, of superiority prospects, but this is often very dependent of placebo arms).
Pilot BE studies are great for everything but screening for formulation matches.:-)

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,363 posts in 4,906 threads, 1,679 registered users;
79 visitors (0 registered, 79 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:18 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The combination of some data and an aching desire
for an answer does not ensure that a reasonable answer
can be extracted from a given body of data.    John W. Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5