...and a bonus question [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2018-02-09 12:32 (1876 d 17:12 ago) – Posting: # 18387
Views: 14,781

Hi Helmut,

I have a bonus question, although not about the correlation itself.

If I look at the location of your PE's on the horisontal axis (the AUC axis) then it looks to me like there are more points on the higher side of 1 than on the lower side.

Perhaps it is only a graphical artifact? Or something with the selection of studies plotted?

If not, then I wonder why that wold be so? I imagine you don't really have the answer but I am curious about any speculation from your side or from others. My head is already abuzz with stabilities and overages and much other weird stuff from the odd sock drawer of speculation.

If this is not an artifact then I am almost thinking this would be worth a publication (if it had no already been shown here).

Same might apply for the vertical axis, not sure. Perhaps I am only hallewcinating?:-D

Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,559 posts in 4,725 threads, 1,607 registered users;
22 visitors (0 registered, 22 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The penalty for scientific irrelevance is, of course,
that the statistician’s work is ignored by the scientific community.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz