Accountability of Investigation product [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2018-02-05 15:23 (1877 d 15:44 ago) – Posting: # 18348
Views: 5,816

Hi Anky,

❝ Is protocol training required for IP verification and accountability of IPs?


As it see it, things are pretty simple:
Anyone named on the delegation log should be trained in the specific protocol. The functions you describe are clearly among the tasks that are one way or another important for certain elements of the trial, so they should be on the delegation log, and thus there really is no argument for not training the person in question.

If accountability is wrong after the trial and the person doing it has not received training then I have every reason to believe the authorities will butcher you for not having trained her/him. The root cause or at least a very good part of it will land exactly thereabouts.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,557 posts in 4,724 threads, 1,607 registered users;
16 visitors (0 registered, 16 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The function of genius is not to give new answers, but to pose
new questions which time and mediocrity can resolve.    H.R. Trevor-Roper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5