Alpha adjustment in higher order crossover [Power / Sample Size]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2018-02-01 15:01 (2274 d 15:01 ago) – Posting: # 18322
Views: 20,640

Dear Helmut,

❝ Be aware that simultaneous comparisons inflate the Type I Error (the patient’s risk). I guess that in your first design you will not compare the two test treatments but only T1 vs. R1, T1 vs. R2, T2 vs. R1, and T2 vs. R2. With these k=4 comparisons (each performed at the nominal α 0.05) the Familywise (Type I) Error Rate will be 1–(1–α)k≤18.55%. Bonferroni’s adjusted α will be α/k or 0.0125 which translates into a 100(1–2α/k) or 97.5% two-sided confidence interval whilst keeping the FWER with 1–(1–α/k)k≤4.91% below the nominal α 0.05. The lower α will substantially increase the sample size ...


Also you may be correct I must confess that I seldom or never had done this alpha-adjustment in case I used a higher order design. Reasons:


Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,656 registered users;
112 visitors (0 registered, 112 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5