EU Clinical Trials Register: useless? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-01-23 18:57 (1893 d 10:05 ago) – Posting: # 18281
Views: 7,884

Dear Ohlbe,

❝ ❝ #3: 12.8% of studies were inspected? Wow! […]

❝ No. […] I would expect the figure to be much lower.

All too bad!

Any ideas about:

❝ ❝ #4: Zero?!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,559 posts in 4,725 threads, 1,607 registered users;
21 visitors (0 registered, 21 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The penalty for scientific irrelevance is, of course,
that the statistician’s work is ignored by the scientific community.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz