EU Clinical Trials Register: useless? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-01-23 18:57 (2341 d 05:22 ago) – Posting: # 18281
Views: 8,372

Dear Ohlbe,

❝ ❝ #3: 12.8% of studies were inspected? Wow! […]

❝ No. […] I would expect the figure to be much lower.

All too bad!

Any ideas about:

❝ ❝ #4: Zero?!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
23,059 posts in 4,841 threads, 1,663 registered users;
31 visitors (0 registered, 31 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[…] an inappropriate study design is incapable of answering
a research question, no matter how careful the subsequent
methodology, conduct, analysis, and interpretation:
Flawless execution of a flawed design achieves nothing worthwhile.    J. Rick Turner

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz