EU Clinical Trials Register: useless? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2018-01-23 18:54 (2370 d 17:19 ago) – Posting: # 18280
Views: 8,378

Dear Helmut,

❝ #3: 12.8% of studies were inspected? Wow! Given that some studies with an assigned EudraCT number were never performed, the percentage is higher.


No. In a Phase 3 study they may have inspected several clinical sites, the sponsor, a central lab, a CRO... And several Member States may inspect the same trial. So I would expect the figure to be much lower.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,112 posts in 4,858 threads, 1,644 registered users;
72 visitors (0 registered, 72 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It’s always fun to have your models validated,
but is way more fun to have them trashed.
Finding out you are completely wrong
is a great part of science.    G. Randall Gladstone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5