Line extension [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-01-23 18:40 (2274 d 11:50 ago) – Posting: # 18278
Views: 4,295

Hi Mikkabel,

Luckily you are not exceeding the recommended dose of the originator. Hence, I would opt for a simple line extension (T2 vs. 2×T1) since you can expect a better match than in BE – which is possible as well (T2 vs. 2×R).
I don’t see how you could perform a dose-proportionality study with just two levels (zero degrees of freedom).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,984 posts in 4,822 threads, 1,650 registered users;
45 visitors (0 registered, 45 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t fix by analysis
what you bungled by design.    Richard J. Light, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5