Line extension [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-01-23 18:40 (2652 d 02:20 ago) – Posting: # 18278
Views: 5,125

Hi Mikkabel,

Luckily you are not exceeding the recommended dose of the originator. Hence, I would opt for a simple line extension (T2 vs. 2×T1) since you can expect a better match than in BE – which is possible as well (T2 vs. 2×R).
I don’t see how you could perform a dose-proportionality study with just two levels (zero degrees of freedom).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
93 visitors (0 registered, 93 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5