Which is better for missing periods PROC GLM or PROC MIXED [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Mohamed Yehia  – Egypt, 2018-01-23 10:48 (2618 d 01:01 ago) – Posting: # 18261
Views: 5,734

Hi All,

Hope everything is fine and going well.

For Partial and full replicate studies, if we have some subjects with missing periods, i mean for example subjects who attended only 2 periods in partial replicate

I have only one question:

1) Which method to use following the EMA guidelines; method A "GLM" or method B "Mixed"?.

I am not an expert in statistics, however I read some papers stated "PROC GLM uses least squares or method of moments to fit general linear models. On the other hand, PROC MIXED uses Restricted (or residual) Maximum Likelihood (REML). PROC MIXED is recommended to avoid pitfalls of PROC GLM."

I want a clarified answer please with guideline reference if applicable.

Thanks.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,707 registered users;
33 visitors (0 registered, 33 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:50 CET (Europe/Vienna)

It’s easy to lie with statistics;
it is easier to lie without them.    Frederick Mosteller

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5