Screening for illicit drugs [Design Issues]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2018-01-16 13:44 (2349 d 00:51 ago) – Posting: # 18179
Views: 6,944

Hi Norah,

there are no well-defined rules. But I assure you that you don't want to be in a situation where you haven't done it and it then causes issue downstream. It is going to be your problem and the sponsor's problem regardless of IEC+regulatory approval.
Section 3 of ICH E6 in a way gives the IEC/IRB some "responsibility" for rights, well-being, safety of trial participants. In practice though this is a bit messy and does not mean the CROs/Sponsor's responsibility is offloaded on a bureaucratic parallel universe if something happens.

Chest Xray and ECG are a bit in the same category. They are not done routinely in certain parts of Asia.

I don't know where the limit is. You can die from infection from an in-grown toe nail, yet I never saw any source or CRF mentioning a specific check for this condition was done. :-)

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,059 posts in 4,841 threads, 1,649 registered users;
34 visitors (0 registered, 34 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are only two kinds of scholars;
those who love ideas and those who hate them.    Emile Chartier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5