Full ACK [Power / Sample Size]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2017-12-28 17:41 (926 days 17:05 ago) – Posting: # 18116
Views: 25,872

Dear David,

» In this case, given your simulations above and the expected probability of approximately 12% of the studies having power greater then 95% having in consideration the initial assumptions, post hoc power means nothing.

Full ACK.
But not only in this case, also in other cases. The concept of post-hoc power is flawed by its own.

» But if you had 100 studies instead and 90% of the had >95% power although the sample size was calculated assuming expected power of 80%, some questions and conclusions might be drawn from those results, don't you think? From my understanding of the initial question, this was the case found. So I think that they should start by reviewing how they define their assumptions for the sample size, namely why they assume GMR=1.10 instead of the "normal" 0.95/1.05.

Again: Full ACK.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,817 posts in 4,356 threads, 1,447 registered users;
online 27 (1 registered, 26 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:46 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Statistics are no substitute for judgment.    Henry Clay

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5