Stop estimating post hoc power! [Power / Sample Size]

posted by kms.srinivas – India, 2017-12-26 14:00 (2680 d 05:14 ago) – Posting: # 18085
Views: 36,246

❝ If the irrelevant post hoc power is always 98%, I suspect a flaw in the software (or SAS macro).

❝ If it is always higher than the one used in sample size estimation it may be a miscalculation – ineradicably “popular” in Indian CROs (see this post). Revise your procedures


I'm sorry, I mean to say always it is coming in the interval 95 to 99 and some times 100 ofcourse one time only, some times we are getting less power on 80s but very less times.


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
106 visitors (0 registered, 106 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5