Stop estimating post hoc power! [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-12-26 13:22 (1921 d 15:59 ago) – Posting: # 18084
Views: 32,824

Hi kms,

❝ I'm getting surprising results always that I'm taking sample size with 80% power and by coming to the results always 98 Power it is reaching....How it is possible always?


If the irrelevant post hoc power is always 98%, I suspect a flaw in the software (or SAS macro).
If it is always higher than the one used in sample size estimation it may be a miscalculation – ineradicably “popular” in Indian CROs (see this post). Revise your procedures.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,559 posts in 4,725 threads, 1,607 registered users;
15 visitors (0 registered, 15 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The penalty for scientific irrelevance is, of course,
that the statistician’s work is ignored by the scientific community.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5