Reference-scaling: USE PowerTOST [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Astea – Russia, 2017-12-01 15:16 (1946 d 14:05 ago) – Posting: # 18031
Views: 13,720

Dear Helmut!

Thank you for enlightening this question!

The advantage of R is doubtless. I just wanted to show FARTSSIE not worser than other rude methods of sample size estimation (remember nomogram and so on).

(Sorry, I've made a mistake in the previous post, the data from the paper refers to partial replicate design 2x3x3.)

By the way, for extreme numbers from the paper by Endrényi L, Tóthfalusi L. we also get slightly underpowered study:

[1] 0.79917
[1] 0.79782

"Being in minority, even a minority of one, did not make you mad"

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,559 posts in 4,725 threads, 1,607 registered users;
13 visitors (0 registered, 13 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The penalty for scientific irrelevance is, of course,
that the statistician’s work is ignored by the scientific community.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz