Nope [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by nobody – 2017-11-14 07:11 (1203 d 22:13 ago) – Posting: # 17978
Views: 6,786

IANAL, but I think what San-Diego-man is proposing is to calculate BE-outcome (pass/fail) after stage 1 and compare it to BE-outcome after the (unnecessary) second stage for, let's say, 1 gazillion of studies and see if there is a meaningful difference.

Isn't this a special example of the more general "forced BE" theme in one-stage designs?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,358 posts in 4,459 threads, 1,492 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 05:25 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

The interpretation of facts in a certain way
stimulates other scientists’ thoughts.    Róbert Bárány

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5