Nope [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by nobody – 2017-11-14 07:11 (1277 d 10:27 ago) – Posting: # 17978
Views: 7,036

IANAL, but I think what San-Diego-man is proposing is to calculate BE-outcome (pass/fail) after stage 1 and compare it to BE-outcome after the (unnecessary) second stage for, let's say, 1 gazillion of studies and see if there is a meaningful difference.

Isn't this a special example of the more general "forced BE" theme in one-stage designs?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,461 posts in 4,487 threads, 1,514 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 17:38 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

Art is “I”; science is “we”.    Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz