Nope [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by nobody – 2017-11-14 08:11 (993 d 20:01 ago) – Posting: # 17978
Views: 6,248

IANAL, but I think what San-Diego-man is proposing is to calculate BE-outcome (pass/fail) after stage 1 and compare it to BE-outcome after the (unnecessary) second stage for, let's say, 1 gazillion of studies and see if there is a meaningful difference.

Isn't this a special example of the more general "forced BE" theme in one-stage designs?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,964 posts in 4,373 threads, 1,459 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 05:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

My doctor gave me six months to live,
but when I couldn’t pay the bill
he gave me six months more.    Walter Matthau

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5