Nope [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by nobody – 2017-11-14 08:11  – Posting: # 17978
Views: 5,387

IANAL, but I think what San-Diego-man is proposing is to calculate BE-outcome (pass/fail) after stage 1 and compare it to BE-outcome after the (unnecessary) second stage for, let's say, 1 gazillion of studies and see if there is a meaningful difference.

Isn't this a special example of the more general "forced BE" theme in one-stage designs?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,128 posts in 4,245 threads, 1,384 registered users;
online 18 (0 registered, 18 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 22:58 CET

You really don’t know what you don’t know until you write about it.
Then, everyone knows what you don’t know.    Rod Machado

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5