Nope [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-11-14 00:21 (1106 d 18:29 ago) – Posting: # 17977
Views: 6,653

Hi ElMaestro,

» Best I can come up with is as follows:
» The only thing that determines the need for for stage 2 is the CV. :blahblah:
»
» So run the sims in the usual fashion, but add 5-20 points on the CV for the power and sample size estimation.

That’s not my point. Meditate over my example. We would initiate the second stage with 28 subjects (driven by the CV of Cmax 0.30) but should stop after the first stage for AUC (CV 0.20).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,206 posts in 4,425 threads, 1,481 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 18:50 CET (Europe/Vienna)

All we know about the world teaches us that the effects of A and B
are always different—in some decimal place—for any A and B.
Thus asking “are the effects different?” is foolish.    John W. Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5