A better place to start. [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2017-11-14 00:04 (995 d 20:21 ago) – Posting: # 17976
Views: 6,313

Hi d_labes,

» But that's not the problem Helmut has described, at least as I understand it. Here we initiate a stage 2 from the perspective of the AUC evaluation where it is not neccessary to initiate one.

Best I can come up with is as follows:
The only thing that determines the need for for stage 2 is the CV.
AUCt is generally having a lower CV than Cmax (for the record, I said 'generally', I did not say 'always'). Often it is about 5-20 percentage points.

So run the sims in the usual fashion, but add 5-20 points on the CV for the power and sample size estimation.

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,
ElMaestro

"Pass or fail" (D. Potvin et al., 2008)

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,968 posts in 4,373 threads, 1,461 registered users;
online 14 (0 registered, 14 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 21:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you can’t solve a problem, then there is an easier problem
you can solve: find it.    George Pólya

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5