GMP: EMA and FDA – mutual recognition of inspections [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2017-11-10 20:10 (1962 d 21:46 ago) – Posting: # 17970
Views: 3,484

Hi all,

I am so worried because of all this.

They make it sound like unnecessary inspections are the big problem and that this agreement is the method to get rid of the problem. It sounds right, sensible use of resources, almost LEAN, tax payers money at work, blahblahblah.

But in fact I have never heard of unnecessary inspections, not even when FDA and EMA 'by chance' have been at the same place more or less simultaneously. Especially not when FDA and EMA 'by chance' have been at the same place more or less simultaneously, actually.

I am totally afraid this means less inspections overall, and that would absolutely be a step in the wrong direction. Fraud is on the rise and it is big business - as it is now, it makes good sense to cheat or cut corners because the chance of getting caught is small to state it bluntly. The financial gain is extremely high, unless you just happen to be unlucky enough to get caught.

You will see me happy and singing and dancing when I see inititative towardsA good weekend to all of you.

Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,552 posts in 4,724 threads, 1,606 registered users;
18 visitors (0 registered, 18 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Learning of many things
does not teach intelligence.    Heraclitus of Ephesus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz