ULOQ [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2017-10-30 10:35  – Posting: # 17948
Views: 6,257

Dear Anand,

» After Dilution also it found ULOQ.
»
» Method should be redeveloped or revalidated?

You should dilute further, till you get a result below your ULOQ. If this requires a dilution factor greater than what you tested during validation, then you need to do a partial validation with a greater dilution factor. If you have many results above the ULOQ you may wish to consider to expand your calibration range with a partial validation.

You can't exclude subjects or data points because they are ULOQ: the ULOQ result would be the Cmax for that subject. If you exclude the data, you will bias the outcome of the study.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,805 posts in 4,355 threads, 1,447 registered users;
online 20 (1 registered, 19 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical statistician: One who will not accept that Columbus discovered America…
because he said he was looking for India in the trial plan.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5