AUC infinity: primary for the FDA [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-10-24 17:14  – Posting: # 17913
Views: 3,259

Salam Mokhtar,

» Is AUC0-inf a primary parameter for assessing Bioequivalence or secondary ???

Depends on what is stated in your statistical analysis plan. ;-)
For the FDA you have to demonstrate BE for Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞.
In most other jurisdictions only Cmax are AUC0–t required.

» […] the C.I of cmax and AUC0-t were in the accepted range of Bioequivalence but AUC0-inf outside the range, can the study be accepted??

In many cases the variability of these PK metrics ranks Cmax > AUC0–∞ > AUC0–t. Hence, passing Cmax but failing AUC0–∞ is unlikely but possible.

» Although the drug is not a highly variable drug????

Doesn’t matter.

P.S.: Your keyboard’s ? got jammed numerous times. You should repair or  replace it.

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,871 posts in 4,212 threads, 1,364 registered users;
online 14 (0 registered, 14 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 12:59 CEST

A drug is not bad. A drug is a chemical compound.
The problem comes in when people who take drugs treat them
like a license to behave like an asshole.    Frank Zappa

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5