AUC infinity: primary for the FDA [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-10-24 17:14 (993 d 19:11 ago) – Posting: # 17913
Views: 4,396

Salam Mokhtar,

» Is AUC0-inf a primary parameter for assessing Bioequivalence or secondary ???

Depends on what is stated in your statistical analysis plan. ;-)
For the FDA you have to demonstrate BE for Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞.
In most other jurisdictions only Cmax are AUC0–t required.

» […] the C.I of cmax and AUC0-t were in the accepted range of Bioequivalence but AUC0-inf outside the range, can the study be accepted??

In many cases the variability of these PK metrics ranks Cmax > AUC0–∞ > AUC0–t. Hence, passing Cmax but failing AUC0–∞ is unlikely but possible.

» Although the drug is not a highly variable drug????

Doesn’t matter.

P.S.: Your keyboard’s ? got jammed numerous times. You should repair or  replace it.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,834 posts in 4,358 threads, 1,449 registered users;
online 24 (1 registered, 23 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[Those] who have an excessive faith in their theories or in their
ideas are not only poorly disposed to make discoveries, but they
also make very poor observations.    Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5