BA BE Study with a reference not market authorised [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2017-10-10 19:09 (1996 d 15:04 ago) – Posting: # 17884
Views: 2,820

Hi Rick,

❝ I have a new formulation (NF) of a product (P) that has been demonstrated to be BE to a reference Marketed (RM) product, but it is not authorised. And I want to demonstrate BE of my new formulation (NF) vs the product (P) already BE to the Market authorised (RF).


This is a regular type II variation or a line extension depending on whether P stays on the market after you introduce NF.
If you are not the MA holder for P then the situation is not in any way straightforward. At the end of the day the reference should be an article 8 approved product and judging from your question P might not be?!??. Let us hear some more details, please. Ideally name the RF product :-):-)

Can you elaborate on the passage "(...) it is not authorised": What does "it" refer to, is it P, NF or RM?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,557 posts in 4,724 threads, 1,608 registered users;
11 visitors (0 registered, 11 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A scientist’s aim in a discussion with his colleagues
is not to persuade, but to clarify.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5