Goodness of fits: one model, different datasets [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by nobody – 2017-10-07 18:03 (2001 d 13:13 ago) – Posting: # 17872
Views: 15,945

Hi Danmark!

❝ ... I am very poor at explaining what I think I am looking for :crying: but I would call it a »"fit likelihood" or "correlation statistic that is sample size corrected"...

Ehhm, whut? Maybe you are to fixated for statical testing? How about some oldfashioned "visual inspection of fit" paired with "back-calculated value of calibration samples from calibration function, including relative deviation"?

Just saying ;-)

No idea what you want to compare in the end, so...

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,559 posts in 4,725 threads, 1,607 registered users;
21 visitors (0 registered, 21 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:16 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The penalty for scientific irrelevance is, of course,
that the statistician’s work is ignored by the scientific community.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz