CVs for untransformed data [Software]
Hi mittyri,
Not necessarily should but will. I suggest dividing by the (weighted) global mean.
❝ citing the WNL guide:
❝ intrasubject CV = sqrt(Var(Residual)) / RefLSM
❝ where RefLSM is the Least Squares Mean of the reference treatment.
❝
❝ For me even the formula above is strange. You are dividing overall standard deviation (calculated for both T and R) by LSMean of reference product only. Does that mean that if we inverse R to T, CV should change too?
Not necessarily should but will. I suggest dividing by the (weighted) global mean.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Lack of IntersubjectCV in PHX yicaoting 2017-09-01 11:09 [Software]
- CVs for untransformed data mittyri 2017-09-02 15:46
- CVs for untransformed dataHelmut 2017-09-02 15:57
- CVs for untransformed data yicaoting 2017-09-02 17:50
- CVs for untransformed data Helmut 2017-09-02 19:20
- CVs for untransformed data yicaoting 2017-09-02 23:26
- CVs for untransformed data Helmut 2017-09-02 19:20
- CVs for untransformed data yicaoting 2017-09-02 17:50
- CVs for untransformed data yicaoting 2017-09-03 08:19
- CVs for untransformed data mittyri 2017-09-03 08:41
- CVs for untransformed data yicaoting 2017-09-04 11:35
- CVs for untransformed data mittyri 2017-09-03 08:41
- CVs for untransformed dataHelmut 2017-09-02 15:57
- CVs for untransformed data mittyri 2017-09-02 15:46