loop ↔ vectorized ↔ direct [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2017-08-20 13:22 (1255 d 18:35 ago) – Posting: # 17721
Views: 25,035

Hi Hötzi,

» Later down you makes calls to vecQT1[df] and vecQT2[df]. That’s awfully slooow. Why not simply call qt(p=foo, df=bar) directly?

That kind of benchmarking is misleading. Here you are doing the vectorise operation of array generation numerous times which will never happens in practice; you only need to initialise the arrays once within every run of 1000000 iterations, possible even keep the arrays/vectors across runs.

I agree that whole "once" operation is faster when you use
vecQT1 <- qt(p=1-alpha1, df=1:5000)
(I had no idea you could do that, actually)
, but if you benchmark the entire you you will see the difference may be a few microsecs out of numerous seconds or minutes. Saving 0.0001% time? That's not optimization, it beautification or achieving the same with fewer lines of code which isn't what I am after.

I am not very experienced with vectorised functions at all - I understand code better if loops are visible.:-D That's just me, of course.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,316 posts in 4,446 threads, 1,489 registered users;
online 7 (0 registered, 7 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 07:57 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing fails like success because you do not learn anything from it.
The only thing we ever learn from is failure.
Success only confirms our superstitions.    Kenneth E. Boulding

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5