Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Don’t use the Book by Chow, Shao, Wang!

Don’t use the Book by Chow, Shao, Wang! [Power / Sample Size]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2017-08-16 18:01 (2771 d 07:01 ago) – Posting: # 17694
Views: 19,322

Hi all!

In addition to all what was said up to now:
Don’t use the Book by Chow, Shao, Wang!

It's full of errors, full of a terminology not compatible to other publications so that one has no chance to compare.
(F.i. what are epsilon, delta, sigma1.1 compared to our use of theta0, upper or lower BE limit, intra-subject CV. No one knows! To cite our ol'Sailor "garbage in, garbage out, It's that simple.")

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

sample size in bioequivalence studies daryazyatina 2017-08-03 09:34 [Power / Sample Size]
- sample size in bioequivalence studies BE-proff 2017-08-03 09:55
  - sample size in bioequivalence studies daryazyatina 2017-08-03 10:08
- sample size in bioequivalence studies ElMaestro 2017-08-03 10:17
  - sample size in bioequivalence studies daryazyatina 2017-08-03 10:58
    - sample size in bioequivalence studies DavidManteigas 2017-08-03 12:40
      - sample size in bioequivalence studies daryazyatina 2017-08-03 13:46
      - Don’t use the formula by Chow, Shao, Wang! Helmut 2017-08-03 15:37
        
        Don’t use the formula by Chow, Shao, Wang! daryazyatina 2017-08-03 15:52
        Don’t use the formula by Chow, Shao, Wang! DavidManteigas 2017-08-03 16:12
        
        Don’t use the formula by Chow, Shao, Wang! Helmut 2017-08-03 16:33
        
        Don’t use the Book by Chow, Shao, Wang!d_labes 2017-08-16 16:01
    - compromised power Helmut 2017-08-03 16:04
      - compromised power daryazyatina 2017-08-04 08:15
        
        terminology Helmut 2017-08-04 12:41
        
        terminology daryazyatina 2017-08-16 10:12
        
        terminology Helmut 2017-08-16 18:54
- sample size in bioequivalence studies balinskyi 2018-06-03 12:58