Crap… [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-08-07 22:29 (2742 d 21:13 ago) – Posting: # 17676
Views: 9,441

Hi nobody,

❝ Would not spend a single cent on such a nonsense. How does somethink like that survive peer review?

❝ Now that is published it will be referenced and used as "scientific basis" for further conclusions/studies.


[image]That’s a slow-burn! My memory-span is better than ElMaestro’s (two weeks?) but it took me a while to recall. I was asked in May 2016 about my opinion. The editor wasn’t even sure whether he should reject the manuscript right away or initiate the review process. My response was:

The manuscript is without any scientific value.

I used some strong words which I won’t post here. Will send it to you by PM.

Obviously the editor didn’t listen to me and the reviewers were blind.
Explains why it is called “blind review”. :angry:

❝ How to get such trash retracted?


Practically impossible. You could writer a letter to the editor. Detlew and I tried that once, but the procedure was endless and after months (!) the editor of Pharm Res. suggested we should submit a full MS instead. This was not our intention. We didn’t discover anything new. Only wanted to point out that another article (which made it through the review) was pooh.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,376 posts in 4,912 threads, 1,662 registered users;
256 visitors (0 registered, 256 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:43 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There are sadistic scientists who hurry to hunt down errors
instead of establishing the truth.    Marie Curie

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5