Crap… [Power / Sample Size]
Hi nobody,
That’s a slow-burn! My memory-span is better than ElMaestro’s (two weeks?) but it took me a while to recall. I was asked in May 2016 about my opinion. The editor wasn’t even sure whether he should reject the manuscript right away or initiate the review process. My response was:
Obviously the editor didn’t listen to me and the reviewers were blind.
Explains why it is called “blind review”.
Practically impossible. You could writer a letter to the editor. Detlew and I tried that once, but the procedure was endless and after months (!) the editor of Pharm Res. suggested we should submit a full MS instead. This was not our intention. We didn’t discover anything new. Only wanted to point out that another article (which made it through the review) was pooh.
❝ Would not spend a single cent on such a nonsense. How does somethink like that survive peer review?
❝ Now that is published it will be referenced and used as "scientific basis" for further conclusions/studies.
![[image]](img/uploaded/image238.jpg)
The manuscript is without any scientific value.
I used some strong words which I won’t post here. Will send it to you by PM.Obviously the editor didn’t listen to me and the reviewers were blind.
Explains why it is called “blind review”.

❝ How to get such trash retracted?
Practically impossible. You could writer a letter to the editor. Detlew and I tried that once, but the procedure was endless and after months (!) the editor of Pharm Res. suggested we should submit a full MS instead. This was not our intention. We didn’t discover anything new. Only wanted to point out that another article (which made it through the review) was pooh.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? nobody 2017-08-07 17:14 [Power / Sample Size]
- CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? Helmut 2017-08-07 18:40
- CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? nobody 2017-08-07 19:52
- Crap…Helmut 2017-08-07 20:29
- Crap… nobody 2017-08-07 21:31
- Crap…Helmut 2017-08-07 20:29
- CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? nobody 2017-08-07 19:52
- CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? ElMaestro 2017-08-07 23:04
- CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? nobody 2017-08-08 10:06
- CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? jag009 2017-08-09 06:21
- CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? nobody 2017-08-09 17:11
- CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? Helmut 2017-08-07 18:40