forced BE? [Design Issues]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2017-08-07 17:58 (2820 d 07:00 ago) – Posting: # 17672
Views: 16,404

Hi Hötzi,

❝ Right. But IMHO, the quality of bootstrapping depends on the input. Remember what you once wrote?


I had forgotten that :-D

Truth be told, my aging brain seems to have very little ability to remember anything farther back than 2 weeks. That thread was from 2009, I think the Commodore 64 was still hot back then and movies were in black and white?!

❝ OT: In your current signature you claim to have “an affair with the bootstrap”. Really an affair? I mean, does it respond to your love? Or is it just calf love?


Manuscript accepted last week. Details to follow. I used the bootstrop to solve a BE-related problem that no Sponsor apparently was able to find a solution to over the last five years. One reviewer was pretty upset (I even got spanked for using the term Sponsor). I hope it wasn't you :-D:-D:-D
I am trying to re-arrange a meeting in September; if I am successful I can give a 20 min talk about it at the event in Prague if anyone cares? It requires, though, that the paper (probably a one-pager in letter form) is published at that time.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
19 visitors (0 registered, 19 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is true that many scientists are not philosophically minded
and have hitherto shown much skill and ingenuity
but little wisdom.    Max Born

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5