sample size in bioequivalence studies [Power / Sample Size]
Hi ElMaestro,
Thank you
For comparison, I use all the standard properties. Design 2x2, confidence intervals 0.8 - 1.25, power 0.8, alpha 0.05.
The only thing about what I'm not sure is CV. Because in formula that I used this is intra-subject variability, but in PowerTOST() this is coefficient of variation as ratio. In calculations in both cases I used СV - 0.3.
And this is results from
The sample size by the formula I used:
n=28



❝ Good choice
Thank you
❝ Can you tell what your design is and which values you want to plug in for the calculation? If the difference is 2 or 4 subjects, then so be it, subtle differences in approximation may account for that. If the difference is 46 or something then I'd wonder, too. I am sure there is an explanation and that your confidence in the powerTOST package can easily be restored.
For comparison, I use all the standard properties. Design 2x2, confidence intervals 0.8 - 1.25, power 0.8, alpha 0.05.
The only thing about what I'm not sure is CV. Because in formula that I used this is intra-subject variability, but in PowerTOST() this is coefficient of variation as ratio. In calculations in both cases I used СV - 0.3.
And this is results from
sampleN.TOST()
sampleN.TOST(logscale = TRUE, CV = 0.3, details = TRUE)
+++++++++++ Equivalence test - TOST +++++++++++
Sample size estimation
-----------------------------------------------
Study design: 2x2 crossover
log-transformed data (multiplicative model)
alpha = 0.05, target power = 0.8
BE margins = 0.8 ... 1.25
True ratio = 0.95, CV = 0.3
Sample size (total)
n power
40 0.815845
The sample size by the formula I used:
n=28
❝ Apart from that you are of course right if you intended to hint that the author of the power.TOST family of R functions is a dubious character.



Complete thread:
- sample size in bioequivalence studies daryazyatina 2017-08-03 09:34 [Power / Sample Size]
- sample size in bioequivalence studies BE-proff 2017-08-03 09:55
- sample size in bioequivalence studies daryazyatina 2017-08-03 10:08
- sample size in bioequivalence studies ElMaestro 2017-08-03 10:17
- sample size in bioequivalence studiesdaryazyatina 2017-08-03 10:58
- sample size in bioequivalence studies DavidManteigas 2017-08-03 12:40
- sample size in bioequivalence studies daryazyatina 2017-08-03 13:46
- Don’t use the formula by Chow, Shao, Wang! Helmut 2017-08-03 15:37
- Don’t use the formula by Chow, Shao, Wang! daryazyatina 2017-08-03 15:52
- Don’t use the formula by Chow, Shao, Wang! DavidManteigas 2017-08-03 16:12
- Don’t use the formula by Chow, Shao, Wang! Helmut 2017-08-03 16:33
- Don’t use the Book by Chow, Shao, Wang! d_labes 2017-08-16 16:01
- compromised power Helmut 2017-08-03 16:04
- compromised power daryazyatina 2017-08-04 08:15
- terminology Helmut 2017-08-04 12:41
- terminology daryazyatina 2017-08-16 10:12
- terminology Helmut 2017-08-16 18:54
- terminology daryazyatina 2017-08-16 10:12
- terminology Helmut 2017-08-04 12:41
- compromised power daryazyatina 2017-08-04 08:15
- sample size in bioequivalence studies DavidManteigas 2017-08-03 12:40
- sample size in bioequivalence studiesdaryazyatina 2017-08-03 10:58
- sample size in bioequivalence studies balinskyi 2018-06-03 12:58
- sample size in bioequivalence studies BE-proff 2017-08-03 09:55