Centralized monitoring for BE? [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2017-07-13 20:29 (2471 d 18:25 ago) – Posting: # 17539
Views: 3,810

Dear ElMaestro,

This thread has generated so many comments from enthusiastic crowds that I can't resist adding my twopence.

I think that just like most of the rest of ICH E6, the few bits and pieces on central monitoring were written with Phase 2-3 trials in mind. Or at least, multicentre studies using eCRF (not necessarily EDC systems for patient reporting outcome, such as these nice e-diaries where you can so easily see that all data from a 3-month period were entered on the day before the next visit to the Doc, or even while at the trial site because the Study Nurse is not happy).

I don't quite see the applicability to BE trials. Particularly considering the way the monitoring of BE trials is often organised in my experience: visits during the trial conduct, which are half-way between monitoring and in-process auditing, and quite different from the way they are done in Phase 2-3.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,987 posts in 4,824 threads, 1,664 registered users;
89 visitors (0 registered, 89 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5