Missing values [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-04-02 16:54 (6245 d 08:58 ago) – Posting: # 1751
Views: 17,392

Dear Ratnakar,

I think your approach is reasonable, but consider also:

❝ But one of our sponsor says that we should have a priori criteria in percentage. For example if he had completed 90% of samples then he will be included and if not then will be excluded from the analysis.


I would call this some kind of formalistic nonsense. :angry:
Imagine the situation of a delayed release formulation which shows a lot of variability in tlag due to gastric emptying. Rate of absorption and elimination are pretty nicely stable within subjects. If we have 18 sampling points, the first two after the predose sample are missing (e.g., vial broken in centrifugation) and the next two samples are still BLQ (due to tlag), your sponsor would really want to exclude the subject and decrease the power of the study? :ok:

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
114 visitors (0 registered, 114 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things.
You just get used to them.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5