General BE topics [Design Issues]

posted by DavidManteigas – Portugal, 2017-06-12 14:35 (2509 d 04:08 ago) – Posting: # 17487
Views: 16,273

Hi VSL,

In my opinion, from my knowledge of the portuguese regulators, there is a lack of members with statistical expertise to properly assess the adequacy of the sample size, or any other question regarding statistical methods, either in Ethics Committees or the regulator.

In my plans for 2018, I will attempt to meet with the portuguese regulator so they can gave me access to their approved studies in bioequivalence in the last years so I can quantify the degree of overpowering of bioequivalence studies when compared to the observed CV and the predicted/guessed/magically obtained predicted CV. My intent is to publish a paper with that information and to sensitize regulators and ethics committees to this issue, which mixes both the sample size calculation and the adequacy of the study design in light of the available information.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,651 registered users;
102 visitors (1 registered, 101 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5