General BE topics [Design Issues]

posted by VSL – India, 2017-06-06 21:34 (2882 d 01:08 ago) – Posting: # 17455
Views: 17,357

Dear ElMaestro and Helmut,

Thank you very much for the explanation.

One more question, why regulatory agencies are allowing studies with deliberate high power? I mean, it is forced BE, unethical and violation of Declaration of Helsinki (Human exposure without scientific rationale). There has to be the scientific tradeoff in setting alfa and beta values while calculating sample size rather mere assumption. I have seen post analysis power more than 90% in many studies. If you ask biostatisticians, they say, we don't know, it comes, no justification is required as the study has passed.

Thank you again.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
29 visitors (0 registered, 29 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is true that many scientists are not philosophically minded
and have hitherto shown much skill and ingenuity
but little wisdom.    Max Born

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5