Incurred sample reanalysis [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Dear Sushil,
Please follow the forum policy when posting, particularly under "Be polite".
I agree with ElMaestro. Using the ISR result may not be accepted and should only be considered if:
- you have identified a root cause for the deviation. I mean a real root cause, not just something like "the analyst may have made a mistake when processing the sample"
- you can identify all samples affected by this same root cause and re-analyse them. Meaning, not just those already re-analysed for ISR and where you found a large difference.
One example could be a situation where the analyst failed to react on internal standard response deviation. You could go back to the raw data, identify all samples with IS deviation and re-analyse them.
Please follow the forum policy when posting, particularly under "Be polite".
❝ After ISR investigation (for the samples those are having % difference more that 50 %), Can we report and consider ISR value for PK and Stat analysis if it is mentioned in the SOP?
I agree with ElMaestro. Using the ISR result may not be accepted and should only be considered if:
- you have identified a root cause for the deviation. I mean a real root cause, not just something like "the analyst may have made a mistake when processing the sample"
- you can identify all samples affected by this same root cause and re-analyse them. Meaning, not just those already re-analysed for ISR and where you found a large difference.
One example could be a situation where the analyst failed to react on internal standard response deviation. You could go back to the raw data, identify all samples with IS deviation and re-analyse them.
—
Regards
Ohlbe
Regards
Ohlbe
Complete thread:
- Incurred sample reanalysis sushil.pimpare 2017-06-06 07:53 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- Incurred sample reanalysis ElMaestro 2017-06-06 10:20
- Incurred sample reanalysisOhlbe 2017-06-06 12:10