“Group effect” in BE [Surveys]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-05-31 22:38 (2816 d 13:05 ago) – Posting: # 17438
Views: 6,831

Hi Ben,

❝ […] I am actually excited to have some kind of insights of the results.

❝ Will you present this at some point in time?


I will write a paper on it. What I have so far over there. The survey started last Saturday; six respondents as of today. ;-)

❝ ❝ Do you assess models recommended by the FDA?

❝ ❝ ...

❝ ❝ Do you follow the decision scheme recommended by the FDA?

❝ ❝ ...


❝ Maybe I completely missed it, but I couldn't find those recommendations in the guidances.


Stop searching. Nothing specific about multigroup studies in the FDA’s 2001 biostats guidance.

❝ Is there a reference, would you be so kind and share it if possible?


See f.i. here or there. You may find some deficiency letters by the FDA with the same wording on the net. [image] this:
"Group-by-treatment interaction" FDA filetype:pdf

Model 1, testing of the G×T term at the 0.1 level and dropping if n.s. (⇒ Model 2) is described by Bolton and Bon.*



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,380 posts in 4,914 threads, 1,665 registered users;
85 visitors (0 registered, 85 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:43 CET (Europe/Vienna)

When people learn no tools of judgment
and merely follow their hopes,
the seeds of political manipulation are sown.    Stephen Jay Gould

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5