Russian «Экс­пер­тами» following the EEU GLs [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Beholder  – Russia, 2017-05-25 00:37 (2553 d 05:18 ago) – Posting: # 17410
Views: 28,862

Hello Helmut!

❝ Does any of our Russian members know whether the above was ever accepted? This section talks about giving in the report a justification for not performing such an analysis. Has anybody ever tried to give the justification already in the protocol? If yes, what happened? If no, why not?


You are citing too fresh doc I think. The doc came into force on 6th of May. So strictly speaking it was not obligatory to use draft of the doc during clinical trial conducting before 6th of May. So, nobody used it I think and no experience was gathered.

But I would try it))

If Im not mistaken, you wrote something about such algorithm somewhere in forum but I could not find it.

Best regards
Beholder

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,033 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,647 registered users;
42 visitors (0 registered, 42 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Give me a fruitful error any time, full of seeds, bursting with its own corrections.
You can keep your sterile truth for yourself.    Vilfredo Pareto

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5